Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
ERM Implementation Overview 
Nov. 16, 2005

  • Task Force Members: Yem Fong (co-chair) Peggy Jobe (co-chair), Wendy Baia, John Culshaw, Linda Helgoth, Jina Wakimoto, Heather Wicht
2
Introduction--What is ERM
  • An Innovative module that provides mechanisms for managing licensed resources (e-journals, A&I indexes, full-text databases, other e-content).
  • Functionally integrates with the Millennium system
  • Tracks transactional and decision support data such as:
    • Trials, acquisitions, consortia arrangements and financial information
    • Licensing provisions and conditions
    • Access provision, discovery and display tools
    • Administration (local controls)
    • Maintenance/management (downtime, access issues, platform changes)
    • Evaluation and collection management support (use statistics, cost per use, other reports)
3
Why Invest in ERM
  • Tremendous shift from print to online
  • Publishing models have dramatically changed, no more print + “free” online
  • Growth in publisher packages (SD, Wiley, Springer, Emerald, Oxford)
  • Marketing to consortia for the “big deals”
  • Expenditures for electronic resources increasingly large part of materials budget


4
Library Expenditures on E-Resources
5
What does this mean for the libraries?
  • Organizational shift – breaking down barriers
  • Acquiring and managing e-resources across departments and job descriptions
  • Complexity of process requires new strategies, new responses and additional resources
  • How can we streamline processes and establish best practices that will add value and maximize our e-collections and dollars invested?
6
 
7
Why ERM?
8
How ERM was developed…
  • Development partnership between Innovative and several large academic customers
  • Brainstorming session with University of Washington
  • Libraries submitted ‘scenarios’ to Innovative to describe how they work with e-resources
9
ERM Goals
  • Integrate licensing and purchasing data with a single interface
  • eliminate local data silos (spreadsheets, databases, filing cabinets)
  • provide relevant info to users via OPAC
10
Why ERM from Innovative?
  • Wanted to integrate e-resources management workflow into Chinook
  • Same interface – need to learn new record structure but no need to learn new ways of doing things
  • Create lists – once populated, can use power of create lists function to crunch data about e-resources


11
Why ERM from Innovative?
  • Innovative ERM first in marketplace thus most developed
  • Others (i.e. Endeavor’s Meridian, Ex Libris’  Verde) would have required new vendor relationship and lacked integration with Chinook
12
What was added to Chinook?
  • Resource records (.e)
  • License records (.l)
  • Contact records (.t)


  • ERM module



13
Chinook Database Structure
14
ERM Database Structure
15
Information about the
Implementation of ERM

  • Minutes, documentation, and other information is available from Chinook Corner at http://ucblibraries.colorado.edu/systems/chinook.htm
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
32
ERM Public Display Issues
  • Viewing other catalogs reveals many variations in ERM public display practices and states of implementation.
  • Will we provide both bib and resource records for the nine categories of e-resources we’ve identified?
  • What information should we display to the public from resource and license records, where will we display this and what types of information will be hot-linked?
33
ERM Public Display Issues
  • Will we just use broad local subjects for resource records vs. LC subjects for bib records?
  • What happens to current Chinook “Find Articles and More” – A-Z list and subject list?
  • What happens to current Chinook E-Journal Finder?
  • Will we supply brief catalog records for titles we don’t have in Chinook?
  • We can test display options on the staging server.
  • We plan to form working groups with additional Libraries personnel to study the issues and make recommendations.


34
ERM Demonstration Sites
  • Bowling Green State University http://maurice.bgsu.edu/screens/opacmenu.html


  • Deakin University http://library.deakin.edu.au/


  • University of Washington http://catalog.lib.washington.edu/search~/


35
References
  • Collins, Maria. Electronic Resource Management Systems: Understanding the Players and How to Make the Right Choice for Your Library.  Serials Review v. 31 no.2 (2005) p. 125-40.
  • Emery, Jill. Beginning to See the Light: Developing a Discourse for Electronic Resource Management.  The Serials Librarian v. 47 no. 4 (2005) p. 137-47.
  • Fong, Yem and Heather Wicht.  Software for Managing Licenses and Compliance.  Journal of Library Administration v. 42 (2005) p. 143-161.
  • Grover, Diane., and Ted Fons.  The Innovative Electronic Resource Management System: A Development Partnership.  Serials Review v. 30 no. 2 (2004) p. 110-116.
  • Harvell, Tony.  Electronic Resources Management Systems: The Experience of Beta Testing and Implementation.  The Serials Librarian v. 47 no. 4 (2005) p. 125-36.
  • Tull, Laura., et. al.  Integrating and Streamlining Electronic Resources Workflows via Innovative’s Electronic Resource Management.  The Serials Librarian v. 47. no.4 (2005) p. 103-24.